Figure 1: Graphic showing the improved alignment possible in the 3D Hydrography Program by deriving hydrography data from high-quality 3DEP elevation data.
3D National Topography Model General Mailbox
Science and Products
Figure 1: Graphic showing the improved alignment possible in the 3D Hydrography Program by deriving hydrography data from high-quality 3DEP elevation data.
Figure 7: Chart showing the general schedule and implementation milestones for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP)
linkFigure 7: Chart showing the general schedule and implementation milestones for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP). Terms: 3DNTM, 3D National Topography Model; CONUS, conterminous United States; FY, fiscal year; HI, Hawaii; NHDPlus HR, National Hydrography Dataset Plus High Resolution.
Figure 7: Chart showing the general schedule and implementation milestones for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP)
linkFigure 7: Chart showing the general schedule and implementation milestones for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP). Terms: 3DNTM, 3D National Topography Model; CONUS, conterminous United States; FY, fiscal year; HI, Hawaii; NHDPlus HR, National Hydrography Dataset Plus High Resolution.
Figure 5: Chart showing phases of data acquisition, processing, and delivery to partners and the public for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP)
linkFigure 5: Chart showing phases of data acquisition, processing, and delivery to partners and the public for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP). The phases are similar to those used for the 3D Elevation Program (3DEP). USGS, U.S. Geological Survey.
Figure 5: Chart showing phases of data acquisition, processing, and delivery to partners and the public for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP)
linkFigure 5: Chart showing phases of data acquisition, processing, and delivery to partners and the public for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP). The phases are similar to those used for the 3D Elevation Program (3DEP). USGS, U.S. Geological Survey.
Figure 3: Comparison of three scenarios for the 3D Hydrography Program including 1) status quo, 2) derive new data from 1-meter DEMs, and 3) derive new data from 0.5-meter DEMs. The USGS vision for 3DHP is based on Scenario 2, which has consistent nationwide coverage in 9 years with approximately 200-300 million stream features, an improved data model, mee
Figure 3: Comparison of three scenarios for the 3D Hydrography Program including 1) status quo, 2) derive new data from 1-meter DEMs, and 3) derive new data from 0.5-meter DEMs. The USGS vision for 3DHP is based on Scenario 2, which has consistent nationwide coverage in 9 years with approximately 200-300 million stream features, an improved data model, mee
Figure 2: Conceptual graphic illustrating how observations about the Nation’s waters – water-quality information, fish occurrence, flow, bed material, and so on – can be attached to points along the stream network (as shown by the blue pins), or along lengths of the stream network as shown by the magenta pins and line
Figure 2: Conceptual graphic illustrating how observations about the Nation’s waters – water-quality information, fish occurrence, flow, bed material, and so on – can be attached to points along the stream network (as shown by the blue pins), or along lengths of the stream network as shown by the magenta pins and line
Figure 6: Chart showing the roles to be played by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Federal partners, State and local partners, the private sector, and users in the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP). Roles include managing the program, acquiring and validating data, and delivering products to partners and the public.
Participant roles include:
Figure 6: Chart showing the roles to be played by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Federal partners, State and local partners, the private sector, and users in the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP). Roles include managing the program, acquiring and validating data, and delivering products to partners and the public.
Participant roles include:
Figure 4: Graph showing the proposed community-wide 9-year costs broken out by category for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP).
linkFigure 4: Graph showing the proposed community-wide 9-year costs broken out by category for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP).
Figure 4: Graph showing the proposed community-wide 9-year costs broken out by category for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP).
linkFigure 4: Graph showing the proposed community-wide 9-year costs broken out by category for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP).
Science and Products
Figure 1: Graphic showing the improved alignment possible in the 3D Hydrography Program by deriving hydrography data from high-quality 3DEP elevation data.
Figure 1: Graphic showing the improved alignment possible in the 3D Hydrography Program by deriving hydrography data from high-quality 3DEP elevation data.
Figure 7: Chart showing the general schedule and implementation milestones for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP)
linkFigure 7: Chart showing the general schedule and implementation milestones for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP). Terms: 3DNTM, 3D National Topography Model; CONUS, conterminous United States; FY, fiscal year; HI, Hawaii; NHDPlus HR, National Hydrography Dataset Plus High Resolution.
Figure 7: Chart showing the general schedule and implementation milestones for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP)
linkFigure 7: Chart showing the general schedule and implementation milestones for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP). Terms: 3DNTM, 3D National Topography Model; CONUS, conterminous United States; FY, fiscal year; HI, Hawaii; NHDPlus HR, National Hydrography Dataset Plus High Resolution.
Figure 5: Chart showing phases of data acquisition, processing, and delivery to partners and the public for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP)
linkFigure 5: Chart showing phases of data acquisition, processing, and delivery to partners and the public for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP). The phases are similar to those used for the 3D Elevation Program (3DEP). USGS, U.S. Geological Survey.
Figure 5: Chart showing phases of data acquisition, processing, and delivery to partners and the public for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP)
linkFigure 5: Chart showing phases of data acquisition, processing, and delivery to partners and the public for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP). The phases are similar to those used for the 3D Elevation Program (3DEP). USGS, U.S. Geological Survey.
Figure 3: Comparison of three scenarios for the 3D Hydrography Program including 1) status quo, 2) derive new data from 1-meter DEMs, and 3) derive new data from 0.5-meter DEMs. The USGS vision for 3DHP is based on Scenario 2, which has consistent nationwide coverage in 9 years with approximately 200-300 million stream features, an improved data model, mee
Figure 3: Comparison of three scenarios for the 3D Hydrography Program including 1) status quo, 2) derive new data from 1-meter DEMs, and 3) derive new data from 0.5-meter DEMs. The USGS vision for 3DHP is based on Scenario 2, which has consistent nationwide coverage in 9 years with approximately 200-300 million stream features, an improved data model, mee
Figure 2: Conceptual graphic illustrating how observations about the Nation’s waters – water-quality information, fish occurrence, flow, bed material, and so on – can be attached to points along the stream network (as shown by the blue pins), or along lengths of the stream network as shown by the magenta pins and line
Figure 2: Conceptual graphic illustrating how observations about the Nation’s waters – water-quality information, fish occurrence, flow, bed material, and so on – can be attached to points along the stream network (as shown by the blue pins), or along lengths of the stream network as shown by the magenta pins and line
Figure 6: Chart showing the roles to be played by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Federal partners, State and local partners, the private sector, and users in the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP). Roles include managing the program, acquiring and validating data, and delivering products to partners and the public.
Participant roles include:
Figure 6: Chart showing the roles to be played by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Federal partners, State and local partners, the private sector, and users in the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP). Roles include managing the program, acquiring and validating data, and delivering products to partners and the public.
Participant roles include:
Figure 4: Graph showing the proposed community-wide 9-year costs broken out by category for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP).
linkFigure 4: Graph showing the proposed community-wide 9-year costs broken out by category for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP).
Figure 4: Graph showing the proposed community-wide 9-year costs broken out by category for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP).
linkFigure 4: Graph showing the proposed community-wide 9-year costs broken out by category for the 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP).