Groundwater Quality—Current Conditions and Changes Through Time
Groundwater—Our Invisible But Vital Resource
Long-Term Changes in Groundwater Quality
Use the interactive online mapper to see how groundwater quality across the Nation has changed over the decades
Rapid Fluctuations in Groundwater Quality—What Do They Mean?
View groundwater quality changes in real time
Is groundwater the source of your drinking water? The USGS is assessing the quality of groundwater used for public supply using newly collected data along with existing water-quality data. Learn more about this invisible, vital resource so many of us depend on.
As part of the National Water Quality Program (NWQP), groundwater quality is being characterized in 20 of the Nation's 68 Principal Aquifers. These 20 aquifers supply most of the groundwater used in the United States—they account for more than three-quarters of the groundwater pumped for public supply and 85 percent of the groundwater pumped for domestic supply.
About 140 million people—almost one-half of the Nation’s population—rely on groundwater for drinking water. Regional assessments of groundwater quality are one component of the NWQP's ongoing efforts to assess, understand, and forecast the quality of the Nation’s groundwater.
Samples collected by the NWQP for the surveys of Principal Aquifers are analyzed for a large suite of regulated and unregulated constituents, including pesticides, radionuclides, metals, and pharmaceuticals. The Principal Aquifer surveys focus on characterizing the quality of groundwater prior to treatment, not the treated drinking water delivered to consumers.
Regional Assessments of Groundwater Quality
To characterize the quality of groundwater many people use for drinking, almost 1,100 deep public-supply wells have been sampled within 15 Principal Aquifers. Although samples are from source water prior to any treatment, for context the results are compared to human-health benchmarks for drinking water.
Groundwater samples were analyzed for hundreds of water-quality constituents. What have we learned?
- At least one inorganic constituent exceeded a human-health benchmark in all of the 15 Principal Aquifers surveyed to date, ranging from 3 to 50 percent of samples.
- At least one organic constituent exceeded a human-health benchmark in 2 of the 15 Principal Aquifers surveyed to date, ranging from 3 to 5 percent of samples.
- Contaminants from geologic sources—primarily trace elements such as arsenic, fluoride, and manganese—most commonly exceeded human-health benchmarks. The Floridan aquifer system was an exception, where strontium was the only trace element to exceed human-health benchmarks.
- At least one radioactive constituent exceeded a human-health benchmark in a small percentage of samples—1 to 10 percent—in most of the 15 Principal Aquifers studied. The exceptions were the Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifers and the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer system, where exceedances were 30 and 45 percent, respectively.
- The nutrient nitrate was the only constituent from manmade sources that exceeded its human-health benchmark, typically in a low percentage of samples (1 or 2 percent). These exceedances occurred in the Floridan aquifer system, the Glacial aquifer system, the Rio Grande aquifer system, and the Valley and Ridge and Piedmont and Blue Ridge carbonate-rock aquifers.
The results are explained in easy-to-understand fact sheets, accessible below:
- The Columbia Plateau basaltic-rock aquifers (northwestern U.S.)
- The High Plains Aquifers (western U.S.)
- The Ozarks Plateaus aquifer system (central U.S.)
- The Biscayne aquifer (southeastern U.S.)
- The Basin and Range basin-fill aquifers (western U.S.)
- The Rio Grande aquifer system (southwestern U.S.)
- The Coastal Lowlands aquifer system (south central U.S.)
- The Mississippi Embayment-Texas Coastal Uplands aquifer system (south-central U.S.)
- The Floridan aquifer system (southeastern U.S.)
- The Southeastern Coastal Plain aquifer system (southeastern U.S.)
- The Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifer system (east coast of U.S.)
- The Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifers (eastern U.S)
- The Valley and Ridge carbonate-rock aquifers and the Piedmont and Blue Ridge carbonate-rock aquifers (eastern U.S.)
- The Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer system (north central U.S.)
- The Glacial aquifer system (northern U.S.)
How has groundwater quality changed over the decades?
Groundwater-quality monitoring data collected many regions of the United States have been synthesized into a national assessment of groundwater-quality trends. Between 1991 and 2010, NAWQA completed assessments groundwater-quality in Principal Aquifers across much of the United States. The assessments characterized groundwater in both deep public-supply wells and shallower domestic (private) wells. Many of those wells have been resampled on a near-decadal timeframe to determine if groundwater quality has changed over time. To date 1,718 wells in 73 well networks—20-30 randomly selected wells designed to examine groundwater quality in a region— have been resampled on a near-decadal time period. The National Water Quality Program will continue to resample wells periodically to build on our understanding of long-term trends in groundwater quality.
An interactive web tool maps these decadal changes in groundwater quality. Using the web tool, users can easily visualize changes in both inorganic and organic constituent concentrations in groundwater, including chloride, nitrate, several pesticides, and some drinking-water disinfection byproducts. The website also includes a description of the methods used to evaluate changes in groundwater quality and a link to the complete set of data.
Shorter-term fluctuations in water quality
As part of the USGS National Water Quality Program, scientists are investigating why, in some areas and at some depths, groundwater quality changes at short timescales—years to months to days to hours, rather than decades. These fluctuations often are in areas where groundwater and surface water interact. This study, called the Enhanced Trends Network, is evaluating these rapid fluctuations, identifying what causes them, and determining whether the changes are just part of a seasonal trend or are part of an overall long-term trend. For those chemical constituents with human-health benchmarks (thresholds for drinking-water quality), changes in constituent concentrations are being evaluated in the context of those benchmarks—in other words, are there certain conditions under which the groundwater might require treatment before drinking?
Learn more about how the Enhanced Trends Network is providing insight on short-term fluctuations in groundwater quality.
Featured Study
Scientists home in on causes of high radium levels in key Midwestern aquifer
As part of the Principal Aquifer surveys, scientists were able to shed new light on processes that happen deep underground. These processes—which cause radium to leach from aquifer rocks into groundwater—are responsible for high concentrations of naturally occurring radium in groundwater from the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer. This aquifer provides more than 630 million gallons of water a day for public supply to parts of Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin.
This USGS study helps explain how radium isotopes 224, 226, and 228 make their way into water in the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer and where concentrations are highest. The study, part of the USGS National Water Quality Assessment Project, reports that water that was recharged into the aquifer long ago, that contains greater amounts of dissolved minerals, and that is low in dissolved oxygen is more likely to leach radium from the surrounding rock.
The groundwater tested came from public supply wells, before treatment and distribution. Radium can be removed from drinking water through treatment, thereby limiting the health risks it poses. Private wells were not tested during this study, however, more than half a million people get their drinking water from private wells that tap the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer. These homeowners might consider having their water tested for radium.
Curious to learn more about groundwater quality near you? Learn about groundwater quality in 22 Principal Aquifers in nine regions across the United States in informative circulars filled with figures, photos, and water-quality information.
Visit the web pages below to learn more about groundwater quality across the United States and the factors that affect it.
Groundwater Quality in Principal Aquifers of the Nation, 1991–2010
Access the data releases in this topic here. Explore more data releases on groundwater quality at ScienceBase.
Below, you’ll find the latest in peer-reviewed journal articles and USGS reports on groundwater-quality in the Nation’s principal aquifers. For more publications on groundwater quality, look here or search the USGS Publications Warehouse. Look here for help using the Pubs Warehouse.
Tritium as an indicator of modern, mixed, and premodern groundwater age
Regional variability of nitrate fluxes in the unsaturated zone and groundwater, Wisconsin, USA
Radium mobility and the age of groundwater in public-drinking-water supplies from the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer system, north-central USA
Groundwater quality in the Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifers, eastern United States
Groundwater quality in the Rio Grande aquifer system, southwestern United States
Groundwater quality in the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer system, midwestern United States
Groundwater quality in the glacial aquifer system, United States
Estimating discharge and nonpoint source nitrate loading to streams from three end‐member pathways using high‐frequency water quality data
Groundwater-quality data from the National Water-Quality Assessment Project, January through December 2014 and select quality-control data from May 2012 through December 2014
Methane in aquifers used for public supply in the United States
Fraction of young water as an indicator of aquifer vulnerability along two regional flow paths in the Mississippi embayment aquifer system, southeastern USA
Predicting redox-sensitive contaminant concentrations in groundwater using random forest classification
A hybrid machine learning model to predict and visualize nitrate concentration throughout the Central Valley aquifer, California, USA
Below are news stories associated with this project.
Contaminants present in many parts of the Glacial aquifer system
Are you one of 30 million Americans whose drinking-water supply relies on groundwater from the glacial aquifer system? A new USGS study assesses the quality of untreated groundwater from this critical water resource, which underlies parts of 25 northern U.S. states.
Is groundwater the source of your drinking water? The USGS is assessing the quality of groundwater used for public supply using newly collected data along with existing water-quality data. Learn more about this invisible, vital resource so many of us depend on.
As part of the National Water Quality Program (NWQP), groundwater quality is being characterized in 20 of the Nation's 68 Principal Aquifers. These 20 aquifers supply most of the groundwater used in the United States—they account for more than three-quarters of the groundwater pumped for public supply and 85 percent of the groundwater pumped for domestic supply.
About 140 million people—almost one-half of the Nation’s population—rely on groundwater for drinking water. Regional assessments of groundwater quality are one component of the NWQP's ongoing efforts to assess, understand, and forecast the quality of the Nation’s groundwater.
Samples collected by the NWQP for the surveys of Principal Aquifers are analyzed for a large suite of regulated and unregulated constituents, including pesticides, radionuclides, metals, and pharmaceuticals. The Principal Aquifer surveys focus on characterizing the quality of groundwater prior to treatment, not the treated drinking water delivered to consumers.
Regional Assessments of Groundwater Quality
To characterize the quality of groundwater many people use for drinking, almost 1,100 deep public-supply wells have been sampled within 15 Principal Aquifers. Although samples are from source water prior to any treatment, for context the results are compared to human-health benchmarks for drinking water.
Groundwater samples were analyzed for hundreds of water-quality constituents. What have we learned?
- At least one inorganic constituent exceeded a human-health benchmark in all of the 15 Principal Aquifers surveyed to date, ranging from 3 to 50 percent of samples.
- At least one organic constituent exceeded a human-health benchmark in 2 of the 15 Principal Aquifers surveyed to date, ranging from 3 to 5 percent of samples.
- Contaminants from geologic sources—primarily trace elements such as arsenic, fluoride, and manganese—most commonly exceeded human-health benchmarks. The Floridan aquifer system was an exception, where strontium was the only trace element to exceed human-health benchmarks.
- At least one radioactive constituent exceeded a human-health benchmark in a small percentage of samples—1 to 10 percent—in most of the 15 Principal Aquifers studied. The exceptions were the Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifers and the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer system, where exceedances were 30 and 45 percent, respectively.
- The nutrient nitrate was the only constituent from manmade sources that exceeded its human-health benchmark, typically in a low percentage of samples (1 or 2 percent). These exceedances occurred in the Floridan aquifer system, the Glacial aquifer system, the Rio Grande aquifer system, and the Valley and Ridge and Piedmont and Blue Ridge carbonate-rock aquifers.
The results are explained in easy-to-understand fact sheets, accessible below:
- The Columbia Plateau basaltic-rock aquifers (northwestern U.S.)
- The High Plains Aquifers (western U.S.)
- The Ozarks Plateaus aquifer system (central U.S.)
- The Biscayne aquifer (southeastern U.S.)
- The Basin and Range basin-fill aquifers (western U.S.)
- The Rio Grande aquifer system (southwestern U.S.)
- The Coastal Lowlands aquifer system (south central U.S.)
- The Mississippi Embayment-Texas Coastal Uplands aquifer system (south-central U.S.)
- The Floridan aquifer system (southeastern U.S.)
- The Southeastern Coastal Plain aquifer system (southeastern U.S.)
- The Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifer system (east coast of U.S.)
- The Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifers (eastern U.S)
- The Valley and Ridge carbonate-rock aquifers and the Piedmont and Blue Ridge carbonate-rock aquifers (eastern U.S.)
- The Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer system (north central U.S.)
- The Glacial aquifer system (northern U.S.)
How has groundwater quality changed over the decades?
Groundwater-quality monitoring data collected many regions of the United States have been synthesized into a national assessment of groundwater-quality trends. Between 1991 and 2010, NAWQA completed assessments groundwater-quality in Principal Aquifers across much of the United States. The assessments characterized groundwater in both deep public-supply wells and shallower domestic (private) wells. Many of those wells have been resampled on a near-decadal timeframe to determine if groundwater quality has changed over time. To date 1,718 wells in 73 well networks—20-30 randomly selected wells designed to examine groundwater quality in a region— have been resampled on a near-decadal time period. The National Water Quality Program will continue to resample wells periodically to build on our understanding of long-term trends in groundwater quality.
An interactive web tool maps these decadal changes in groundwater quality. Using the web tool, users can easily visualize changes in both inorganic and organic constituent concentrations in groundwater, including chloride, nitrate, several pesticides, and some drinking-water disinfection byproducts. The website also includes a description of the methods used to evaluate changes in groundwater quality and a link to the complete set of data.
Shorter-term fluctuations in water quality
As part of the USGS National Water Quality Program, scientists are investigating why, in some areas and at some depths, groundwater quality changes at short timescales—years to months to days to hours, rather than decades. These fluctuations often are in areas where groundwater and surface water interact. This study, called the Enhanced Trends Network, is evaluating these rapid fluctuations, identifying what causes them, and determining whether the changes are just part of a seasonal trend or are part of an overall long-term trend. For those chemical constituents with human-health benchmarks (thresholds for drinking-water quality), changes in constituent concentrations are being evaluated in the context of those benchmarks—in other words, are there certain conditions under which the groundwater might require treatment before drinking?
Learn more about how the Enhanced Trends Network is providing insight on short-term fluctuations in groundwater quality.
Featured Study
Scientists home in on causes of high radium levels in key Midwestern aquifer
As part of the Principal Aquifer surveys, scientists were able to shed new light on processes that happen deep underground. These processes—which cause radium to leach from aquifer rocks into groundwater—are responsible for high concentrations of naturally occurring radium in groundwater from the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer. This aquifer provides more than 630 million gallons of water a day for public supply to parts of Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin.
This USGS study helps explain how radium isotopes 224, 226, and 228 make their way into water in the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer and where concentrations are highest. The study, part of the USGS National Water Quality Assessment Project, reports that water that was recharged into the aquifer long ago, that contains greater amounts of dissolved minerals, and that is low in dissolved oxygen is more likely to leach radium from the surrounding rock.
The groundwater tested came from public supply wells, before treatment and distribution. Radium can be removed from drinking water through treatment, thereby limiting the health risks it poses. Private wells were not tested during this study, however, more than half a million people get their drinking water from private wells that tap the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer. These homeowners might consider having their water tested for radium.
Curious to learn more about groundwater quality near you? Learn about groundwater quality in 22 Principal Aquifers in nine regions across the United States in informative circulars filled with figures, photos, and water-quality information.
Visit the web pages below to learn more about groundwater quality across the United States and the factors that affect it.
Groundwater Quality in Principal Aquifers of the Nation, 1991–2010
Access the data releases in this topic here. Explore more data releases on groundwater quality at ScienceBase.
Below, you’ll find the latest in peer-reviewed journal articles and USGS reports on groundwater-quality in the Nation’s principal aquifers. For more publications on groundwater quality, look here or search the USGS Publications Warehouse. Look here for help using the Pubs Warehouse.
Tritium as an indicator of modern, mixed, and premodern groundwater age
Regional variability of nitrate fluxes in the unsaturated zone and groundwater, Wisconsin, USA
Radium mobility and the age of groundwater in public-drinking-water supplies from the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer system, north-central USA
Groundwater quality in the Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifers, eastern United States
Groundwater quality in the Rio Grande aquifer system, southwestern United States
Groundwater quality in the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer system, midwestern United States
Groundwater quality in the glacial aquifer system, United States
Estimating discharge and nonpoint source nitrate loading to streams from three end‐member pathways using high‐frequency water quality data
Groundwater-quality data from the National Water-Quality Assessment Project, January through December 2014 and select quality-control data from May 2012 through December 2014
Methane in aquifers used for public supply in the United States
Fraction of young water as an indicator of aquifer vulnerability along two regional flow paths in the Mississippi embayment aquifer system, southeastern USA
Predicting redox-sensitive contaminant concentrations in groundwater using random forest classification
A hybrid machine learning model to predict and visualize nitrate concentration throughout the Central Valley aquifer, California, USA
Below are news stories associated with this project.
Contaminants present in many parts of the Glacial aquifer system
Are you one of 30 million Americans whose drinking-water supply relies on groundwater from the glacial aquifer system? A new USGS study assesses the quality of untreated groundwater from this critical water resource, which underlies parts of 25 northern U.S. states.