USGS Scientist Measuring Dissolved Oxygen in Fourmile Creek, Iowa
A Conceptual Diagram of the Setup of the Subsurface Tracer Test
In two separate studies, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists demonstrated that hormones such as estrogen can biodegrade in stream and groundwater environments. This is an important finding because the science, regulatory, and environmental communities have concerns about the environmental fate of endocrine-disrupting chemicals, such as hormones, in the human wastewaters discharged to the environment from wastewater treatment plants and domestic septic systems. The natural female sex hormone17ß-estradiol (estrogen) is made in the human body, and is an important chemical messenger related to female sexual development and reproduction. When concentrated in the environment by the disposal of treated wastewaters there is concern that elevated levels of 17ß-estradiol and other estrogenic chemicals can cause feminization of fish and wildlife exposed to the chemicals. Even though hormones are generally present in the environment near wastewater releases to streams and groundwater, they tend to absorb to sediment and/or degrade during transport.
Hormones in Streams and Rivers
USGS scientists published the results of a study in Environmental Science and Technology that demonstrated there is a significant potential for the biodegradation of three hormones, estrone, 17ß-estradiol, and testosterone, in the bottom sediments of streams that received wastewater from sewage treatment plants (Bradley and others, 2009). Laboratory experiments showed that all three compounds were efficiently degraded in surface water sediments under conditions where oxygen is present.
Hormones in Groundwater
USGS scientists documented in Environmental Science and Technology that 17ß-estradiol biodegrades in the groundwater of a sandy aquifer on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, contaminated with wastewater from a sewage treatment plant (Barber and others, 2009). The scientists tested the ability of 17ß-estradiol to be transported in groundwater by injecting a solution of non-degrading tracer (bromide) and 17ß-estradiol into the subsurface. The resulting subsurface plume or cloud of tracer was allowed to move naturally with the groundwater. As the plume drifted it was monitored via multilevel samplers (see diagram). The results showed that the subsurface movement of 17ß-estradiol was retarded (reduced) when compared to bromide. Laboratory degradation experiments confirmed that the 17B-estradiol was being degraded by naturally occurring bacteria.
Implications
The results of these two studies indicate that biodegradation may give surface water and groundwater environments a natural capacity to reduce the levels of hormones in impacted streams and groundwater and reduce the potential impacts on fish and wildlife.
What About Other Wastewater Contaminants in Groundwater?
In addition to 17ß-estradiol, the scientists also discovered that an antibiotic (sulfamethoxazole) is resistant to biodegradation in subsurface environments and a common detergent degradation product (4-nonylphenol) is biodegradable but to a lesser extent than 17ß-estradiol. In a subsurface tracer test the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole was transported at almost the same rate as bromide (the conservative non-absorbing tracer). In addition, the researchers found sulfamethoxazole throughout most of an existing subsurface wastewater plume at the Cape Cod Toxic Substances Hydrology Program Research Site, Massachusetts. The occurrence of sulfamethoxazole in the contamination plume that is kilometers long and decades old is further evidence that sulfamethoxazole is resistant to natural attenuation in subsurface environments. Previous studies on Cape Cod have shown that free-living bacteria and organic-wastewater contaminants occur in the same wells where sulfamethoxazole was detected. This result indicates that subsurface bacteria have been exposed to antimicrobial compounds for decades. The scientists also conjecture that sulfamethoxazole may be a useful tracer or indicator of subsurface contamination by wastewater from sewage treatment plants.
Related science listed below.
Recovery of Stream and Adjacent Groundwater After Wastewater Treatment Facility Closure
Synthetic Progestin Affects Fish Reproductive Development and Behavior in Laboratory Exposure Study
Long-Term Study Finds Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in Urban Waterways
Personal Care Products, Pharmaceuticals, and Hormones Move from Septic Systems to Local Groundwater
Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Persist Downstream from the Source
Chemicals Found in Treated Wastewater are Transported from Streams to Groundwater
Neuroactive Pharmaceuticals in Minnesota Rivers
Toxins Produced by Molds Measured in U.S. Streams
Biosolids, Animal Manure, and Earthworms: Is There a Connection?
Biological Activity of Steroid Hormones in U.S. Streams
Chemical Combo and Intersex Fish Found at Smallmouth Bass Nesting Sites
Improvements in Wastewater Treatment Reduces Endocrine Disruption in Fish
In two separate studies, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists demonstrated that hormones such as estrogen can biodegrade in stream and groundwater environments. This is an important finding because the science, regulatory, and environmental communities have concerns about the environmental fate of endocrine-disrupting chemicals, such as hormones, in the human wastewaters discharged to the environment from wastewater treatment plants and domestic septic systems. The natural female sex hormone17ß-estradiol (estrogen) is made in the human body, and is an important chemical messenger related to female sexual development and reproduction. When concentrated in the environment by the disposal of treated wastewaters there is concern that elevated levels of 17ß-estradiol and other estrogenic chemicals can cause feminization of fish and wildlife exposed to the chemicals. Even though hormones are generally present in the environment near wastewater releases to streams and groundwater, they tend to absorb to sediment and/or degrade during transport.
Hormones in Streams and Rivers
USGS scientists published the results of a study in Environmental Science and Technology that demonstrated there is a significant potential for the biodegradation of three hormones, estrone, 17ß-estradiol, and testosterone, in the bottom sediments of streams that received wastewater from sewage treatment plants (Bradley and others, 2009). Laboratory experiments showed that all three compounds were efficiently degraded in surface water sediments under conditions where oxygen is present.
Hormones in Groundwater
USGS scientists documented in Environmental Science and Technology that 17ß-estradiol biodegrades in the groundwater of a sandy aquifer on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, contaminated with wastewater from a sewage treatment plant (Barber and others, 2009). The scientists tested the ability of 17ß-estradiol to be transported in groundwater by injecting a solution of non-degrading tracer (bromide) and 17ß-estradiol into the subsurface. The resulting subsurface plume or cloud of tracer was allowed to move naturally with the groundwater. As the plume drifted it was monitored via multilevel samplers (see diagram). The results showed that the subsurface movement of 17ß-estradiol was retarded (reduced) when compared to bromide. Laboratory degradation experiments confirmed that the 17B-estradiol was being degraded by naturally occurring bacteria.
Implications
The results of these two studies indicate that biodegradation may give surface water and groundwater environments a natural capacity to reduce the levels of hormones in impacted streams and groundwater and reduce the potential impacts on fish and wildlife.
What About Other Wastewater Contaminants in Groundwater?
In addition to 17ß-estradiol, the scientists also discovered that an antibiotic (sulfamethoxazole) is resistant to biodegradation in subsurface environments and a common detergent degradation product (4-nonylphenol) is biodegradable but to a lesser extent than 17ß-estradiol. In a subsurface tracer test the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole was transported at almost the same rate as bromide (the conservative non-absorbing tracer). In addition, the researchers found sulfamethoxazole throughout most of an existing subsurface wastewater plume at the Cape Cod Toxic Substances Hydrology Program Research Site, Massachusetts. The occurrence of sulfamethoxazole in the contamination plume that is kilometers long and decades old is further evidence that sulfamethoxazole is resistant to natural attenuation in subsurface environments. Previous studies on Cape Cod have shown that free-living bacteria and organic-wastewater contaminants occur in the same wells where sulfamethoxazole was detected. This result indicates that subsurface bacteria have been exposed to antimicrobial compounds for decades. The scientists also conjecture that sulfamethoxazole may be a useful tracer or indicator of subsurface contamination by wastewater from sewage treatment plants.
Related science listed below.