Small-scale variation in trap placement affects arthropod capture rates on sticky traps in riparian woodlands

Arthropods are important prey for many avian taxa, particularly during the breeding season. Many studies have used sticky traps to estimate relative abundance of arthropods as avian prey, but we know little about the potential biases associated with sticky traps. We evaluated the effect of small-scale variation in trap placement on the biomass of arthropods caught on sticky traps in six riparian woodlands in southeastern Arizona. We detected differences in arthropod biomass between two height categories (1 and 4 m off the ground) for three insect orders and between two sampling locations (0 and 10 m from the center of the stream bed) for two insect orders. These differences indicate that placement of sticky traps affects arthropod capture rates and, hence, small variation in trap placement can bias investigators' ability to document spatial and temporal differences in arthropod abundance. Investigators who use sticky traps to make comparisons of arthropod abundance need to ensure that placement is consistent over time or across treatments to ensure that comparisons are not biased.