Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

How does USGS define peer review and what are the FSP peer review requirements? [038]

By Office of Science Quality and Integrity

USGS defines peer review as scrutiny of work or ideas by colleagues (peers) who are well qualified and who are of equal standing with one another. The FSP requirements for peer review of USGS science information products are found in SM 502.3. [Read more]

USGS defines peer review (also referred to as technical peer review, refereeing, colleague review, or scientific peer review) as scrutiny of work or ideas by colleagues (peers) who are well qualified and who are of equal standing with one another. Peer reviews are rigorous, thorough evaluations of the technical quality and validity of the research design, methods, and conclusions. In the scientific field, the implication is that education and/or experience qualify one to comment on the work of others in a particular field of expertise. Qualified peer reviewers of USGS scientific information products must have no stake in the outcome of the review or publication of the work, are not associated with the work being performed, and are without conflict of interest. The FSP requirements for peer review of USGS science information products are found in SM 502.3.