Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

A comparison in Colorado of three methods to monitor breeding amphibians

January 1, 2000

We surveyed amphibians at 4 montane and 2 plains lentic sites in northern Colorado using 3 techniques: standardized call surveys, automated recording devices (frog-loggers), and intensive surveys including capture-recapture techniques. Amphibians were observed at 5 sites. Species richness varied from 0 to 4 species at each site. Richness scores, the sums of species richness among sites, were similar among methods: 8 for call surveys, 10 for frog-loggers, and 11 for intensive surveys (9 if the non-vocal salamander Ambystoma tigrinum is excluded). The frog-logger at 1 site recorded Spea bombifrons which was not active during the times when call and intensive surveys were conducted. Relative abundance scores from call surveys failed to reflect a relatively large population of Bufo woodhousii at 1 site and only weakly differentiated among different-sized populations of Pseudacris maculata at 3 other sites. For extensive applications, call surveys have the lowest costs and fewest requirements for highly trained personnel. However, for a variety of reasons, call surveys cannot be used with equal effectiveness in all parts of North America.

Publication Year 2000
Title A comparison in Colorado of three methods to monitor breeding amphibians
DOI 10.2307/3536896
Authors P. S. Corn, E. Muths, W.M. Iko
Publication Type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Series Title Northwestern Naturalist
Index ID 1015346
Record Source USGS Publications Warehouse
USGS Organization Fort Collins Science Center