Status and trends of pelagic and benthic prey fish populations in Lake Michigan, 2021
Lake wide acoustic (AC) and bottom trawl (BT) surveys are conducted annually to generate indices of pelagic and benthic prey fish densities in Lake Michigan. The BT survey has been conducted each fall since 1973 using 12-m trawls at depths ranging from 9 to 110 m and includes 70 fixed locations distributed across seven transects; this survey estimates densities of seven prey fish species [i.e., alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus), bloater (Coregonus hoyi), rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax), deepwater sculpin (Myoxocephalus thompsonii), slimy sculpin (Cottus cognatus), round goby (Neogobius melanostomus), ninespine stickleback (Pungitius pungitius)] as well as for age-0 yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and large (> 350 mm) burbot (Lota lota). The AC survey has been conducted each late summer/early fall since 2004, and the 2021 survey consisted of 25 transects [507 km total (315 miles)] covering bottom depths ranging from 15 to 235 m and 42 midwater trawl tows covering bottom depths ranging 13 to 215 m; this survey estimates densities of three prey fish species (i.e., alewife, bloater, and rainbow smelt). The data generated from these surveys are used to estimate various population parameters that are, in turn, used by state and tribal agencies in managing Lake Michigan fish stocks.
For the BT survey, total biomass density of prey fish equaled only 2.4 kg/ha, the 5th lowest estimate of the time series and well below the long-term average total biomass of 34.28 kg/ha. For the AC survey, total biomass density of prey fish equaled 6.61 kg/ha, 50% higher than the longterm average total biomass of 4.28 kg/ha.
The AC survey reported bloater to be the dominant species (by biomass) among prey fishes, while the BT survey reported co-dominance of alewife, bloater, and round goby. Mean biomass of yearling and older (YAO) alewives in 2021 was 1.71 kg/ha in the AC survey and 0.504 kg/ha in the BT survey. Catchability of YAO alewives continues to be substantially lower for the BT survey since 2014.
Comparing the acoustic estimate to previous years, YAO alewife biomass was 10% higher than the 2019 estimate and less than the average from 2004-2019. Numeric density of age-0 alewife from the AC survey was 352 fish/ha in 2021, which is 71% of the long-term mean of 499 fish/ha. The alewife age distribution remained truncated, with age-0 fish and age-1 fish dominating the population. Biomass density of YAO bloater was 3.7 kg/ha in the AC survey and 0.43 kg/ha in the BT survey- each at least an order of magnitude lower than what was estimated by the BT survey between 1981 and 1998. Numeric density of age-0 bloater was the highest ever measured for the AC survey at 1,037 fish/ha while for the BT survey, it was 20 fish/ha. Biomass density of YAO rainbow smelt was 0.13 kg/ha in the AC survey and 0.005 kg/ha in the BT survey, continuing the trend of low rainbow smelt biomass that has been observed since 2001. Numeric density of age-0 rainbow smelt was 84 fish/ha in the AC survey and 1.9 fish/ha in the BT survey, indicating a weak year-class. All four prey fish species sampled only by the BT survey indicated below average biomass densities. Deepwater sculpin was estimated at 0.45 kg/ha, which makes 11 of the past 12 years when biomass was <1 kg/ha. Slimy sculpin was estimated at 0.05 kg/ha, the sixth lowest density ever measured. Round goby was estimated at 0.63 kg/ha, which was below the average biomass of 0.84 kg/ha since 2008. Ninespine stickleback density was < 1 fish/ha. Burbot biomass remained near record low levels, and only three age-0 yellow perch were caught in all trawls, indicating a weak yellow perch year-class in 2021.
Citation Information
Publication Year | 2022 |
---|---|
Title | Status and trends of pelagic and benthic prey fish populations in Lake Michigan, 2021 |
Authors | David Warner, Ralph W. Tingley, Charles P. Madenjian, Benjamin A. Turschak, Dale Hanson |
Publication Type | Report |
Publication Subtype | Organization Series |
Index ID | 70236473 |
Record Source | USGS Publications Warehouse |
USGS Organization | Great Lakes Science Center |