Tag loss can bias Jolly-Seber capture-recapture estimates
We identified cases where the Jolly-Seber estimator of population size is biased under tag loss and tag-induced mortality by examining the mathematical arguments and performing computer simulations. We found that, except under certain tag-loss models and high sample sizes, the population size estimators (uncorrected for tag loss) are severely biased high when tag loss or tag-induced mortality occurs. Our findings verify that this misconception about effects of tag loss and tag-induced mortality could have serious consequences for field biologists interested in population size. Reiterating common sense, we encourage those engaged in capture-recapture studies to be careful and humane when handling animals during tagging, to use tags with high retention rates, to double-tag animals when possible, and to strive for the highest capture probabilities possible.
Citation Information
Publication Year | 2003 |
---|---|
Title | Tag loss can bias Jolly-Seber capture-recapture estimates |
Authors | T. L. McDonald, Steven C. Amstrup, B.F.J. Manly |
Publication Type | Article |
Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
Series Title | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
Index ID | 70025211 |
Record Source | USGS Publications Warehouse |