Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Images

Images related to Yellowstone Volcano Observatory.

Filter Total Items: 528
Kīlauea summit eruption in Halemaʻumaʻu crater - October 1, 2021
Kīlauea summit eruption in Halemaʻumaʻu crater - October 1, 2021
Kīlauea summit eruption in Halemaʻumaʻu crater - October 1, 2021

Aerial image looking to the west of the large island that is floating within the middle of the lava lake in Halema‘uma‘u, at Kīlauea's summit. There are several vents with fountains reaching to just a few meters (yards) high. One of the vents along the eastern margin of the island has started to form spatter ramparts to enclose it. USGS photo by D. Downs.

Aerial image looking to the west of the large island that is floating within the middle of the lava lake in Halema‘uma‘u, at Kīlauea's summit. There are several vents with fountains reaching to just a few meters (yards) high. One of the vents along the eastern margin of the island has started to form spatter ramparts to enclose it. USGS photo by D. Downs.

Kīlauea summit eruption in Halemaʻumaʻu crater - October 1, 2021
Kīlauea summit eruption in Halemaʻumaʻu crater - October 1, 2021
Kīlauea summit eruption in Halemaʻumaʻu crater - October 1, 2021

Aerial view of the active lava lake and vents within Halema‘uma‘u crater, at the summit of Kīlauea. This view is looking to the northwest.

Aerial view of the active lava lake and vents within Halema‘uma‘u crater, at the summit of Kīlauea. This view is looking to the northwest.

Kīlauea summit eruption in Halemaʻumaʻu crater - October 1, 2021
Kīlauea summit eruption in Halemaʻumaʻu crater - October 1, 2021
Kīlauea summit eruption in Halemaʻumaʻu crater - October 1, 2021
Kīlauea summit eruption in Halemaʻumaʻu crater - October 1, 2021

Aerial photo taken during a morning overflight on October 1, 2021, and looking at the west end of the lava lake within Halema‘uma‘u crater, at the summit of Kīlauea. The west vent that is feeding this part of the lava lake is visible; the base of this vent was well above the lava lake when it opened on the afternoon of September 29, 2021.

Aerial photo taken during a morning overflight on October 1, 2021, and looking at the west end of the lava lake within Halema‘uma‘u crater, at the summit of Kīlauea. The west vent that is feeding this part of the lava lake is visible; the base of this vent was well above the lava lake when it opened on the afternoon of September 29, 2021.

Kīlauea summit eruption in Halemaʻumaʻu crater - October 1, 2021
Kīlauea summit eruption in Halemaʻumaʻu crater - October 1, 2021
Kīlauea summit eruption in Halemaʻumaʻu crater - October 1, 2021
Kīlauea summit eruption in Halemaʻumaʻu crater - October 1, 2021

Aerial image looking to the southwest and showing fissures within Halema‘uma‘u, at Kīlauea's summit, producing lava fountains within the southern and south-central part of the lava lake. These lava fountains are less energetic than when the eruption started on September 29, 2021, but are still spattering to heights of about 5 meters (16 ft) or less.

Aerial image looking to the southwest and showing fissures within Halema‘uma‘u, at Kīlauea's summit, producing lava fountains within the southern and south-central part of the lava lake. These lava fountains are less energetic than when the eruption started on September 29, 2021, but are still spattering to heights of about 5 meters (16 ft) or less.

Interferogram created from data collected on September 22, 2020, and September 17, 2021, by the Sentinel-1 satellite system
Yellowstone interferogram from Sentinel-1 spanning September 22, 2020 to September 17, 2021
Yellowstone interferogram from Sentinel-1 spanning September 22, 2020 to September 17, 2021
Yellowstone interferogram from Sentinel-1 spanning September 22, 2020 to September 17, 2021

Interferogram created from data collected on September 22, 2020, and September 17, 2021, by the Sentinel-1 satellite system. Colored fringes indicate a change in distance (called range change) between the satellite and ground surface that is caused by surface deformation.

Interferogram created from data collected on September 22, 2020, and September 17, 2021, by the Sentinel-1 satellite system. Colored fringes indicate a change in distance (called range change) between the satellite and ground surface that is caused by surface deformation.

Extracting pore water from Yellowstone Lake sediment cores
Extracting pore water from Yellowstone Lake sediment cores
Extracting pore water from Yellowstone Lake sediment cores
Extracting pore water from Yellowstone Lake sediment cores

Pore waters from Yellowstone Lake sediment cores collected in August 2021 are extracted through filtration devices into plastic syringes.  Note that the second core from the left appears light in color because the plastic core liner was etched by very hot 91°C (196°F) fluids.

Pore waters from Yellowstone Lake sediment cores collected in August 2021 are extracted through filtration devices into plastic syringes.  Note that the second core from the left appears light in color because the plastic core liner was etched by very hot 91°C (196°F) fluids.

Gravity coring device after sampling Yellowstone Lake sediment
Gravity coring device after sampling Yellowstone Lake sediment
Gravity coring device after sampling Yellowstone Lake sediment
Gravity coring device after sampling Yellowstone Lake sediment

Gravity coring device on the rear deck of the R/V Annie after coring the floor of Yellowstone Lake, with dark mud coating the outside of the corer.  The 100-lb. green coring head is at the top, and the bottom of the barrel has a tapered stainless steel core cutter.

Gravity coring device on the rear deck of the R/V Annie after coring the floor of Yellowstone Lake, with dark mud coating the outside of the corer.  The 100-lb. green coring head is at the top, and the bottom of the barrel has a tapered stainless steel core cutter.

R/V Annie leaves Bridge Bay, Yellowstone National Park
R/V Annie leaves Bridge Bay, Yellowstone National Park
R/V Annie leaves Bridge Bay, Yellowstone National Park
R/V Annie leaves Bridge Bay, Yellowstone National Park

View to the aft of the R/V Annie as it leaves Bridge Bay Marina early in the morning of August 26, 2021.

View to the aft of the R/V Annie as it leaves Bridge Bay Marina early in the morning of August 26, 2021.

Hand-sample photo of what is known to be Lava Creek Tuff “unit 2”
Hand-sample photo of what is known to be Lava Creek Tuff “unit 2”
Hand-sample photo of what is known to be Lava Creek Tuff “unit 2”
Hand-sample photo of what is known to be Lava Creek Tuff “unit 2”

A hand-sample photo of what is known to be Lava Creek Tuff “unit 2.”  Small black scoria pieces are distinctive of this unit compared to the previously recognized Member A and Member B of the Lava Creek Tuff.  Photo by Ray Salazar (Montana State University) on August 16, 2021.

A hand-sample photo of what is known to be Lava Creek Tuff “unit 2.”  Small black scoria pieces are distinctive of this unit compared to the previously recognized Member A and Member B of the Lava Creek Tuff.  Photo by Ray Salazar (Montana State University) on August 16, 2021.

Schematic showing collapse processes of Yellowstone Caldera
Schematic showing collapse processes of Yellowstone Caldera
Schematic showing collapse processes of Yellowstone Caldera
Schematic showing collapse processes of Yellowstone Caldera

Schematic displaying the general processes associated with collapse of Yellowstone Caldera.  (A) Pre-caldera volcanism includes the eruption of dome complexes from the underlying magma chambers.  (B) The caldera-forming eruption evacuates a significant amount of magma from the chamber, causing the overlying crustal block to subside into the void space.&nbs

Schematic displaying the general processes associated with collapse of Yellowstone Caldera.  (A) Pre-caldera volcanism includes the eruption of dome complexes from the underlying magma chambers.  (B) The caldera-forming eruption evacuates a significant amount of magma from the chamber, causing the overlying crustal block to subside into the void space.&nbs

Tabular blocks of layered ash in a matrix of cross-bedded ash deposited by ancestral Missouri River
Tabular blocks of layered ash in a matrix of cross-bedded ash deposited by ancestral Missouri River
Tabular blocks of layered ash in a matrix of cross-bedded ash deposited by ancestral Missouri River
Tabular blocks of layered ash in a matrix of cross-bedded ash deposited by ancestral Missouri River

Typical exposure of tabular blocks of layered ash in a matrix of cross-bedded ash. The tabular blocks were deposited, rapidly hardened, and ripped up and transported downstream along the ancestral Missouri River system with another pulse of ash and water, forming the cross-bedded matrix.

Typical exposure of tabular blocks of layered ash in a matrix of cross-bedded ash. The tabular blocks were deposited, rapidly hardened, and ripped up and transported downstream along the ancestral Missouri River system with another pulse of ash and water, forming the cross-bedded matrix.

“Hey Bear” volcano, Wyoming, with Raggedtop Mountain in the background
“Hey Bear” volcano, Wyoming, with Raggedtop Mountain in the background
“Hey Bear” volcano, Wyoming, with Raggedtop Mountain in the background
“Hey Bear” volcano, Wyoming, with Raggedtop Mountain in the background

“Hey Bear” volcano, Wyoming, with Raggedtop Mountain in the background. Hey Bear volcano is a small scoria cone that is about 1.3 million years old and that erupted over Eocene (~50 million-year-old) rocks (noted by yellow dotted line). Photo by Matthew Brueseke, Kansas State University, August 2021, used with permission.

“Hey Bear” volcano, Wyoming, with Raggedtop Mountain in the background. Hey Bear volcano is a small scoria cone that is about 1.3 million years old and that erupted over Eocene (~50 million-year-old) rocks (noted by yellow dotted line). Photo by Matthew Brueseke, Kansas State University, August 2021, used with permission.

Twin Buttes in Lower Geyser Basin, with Excelsior Geyser of Midway Geyser Basin in the foreground
Twin Buttes in Lower Geyser Basin, with Excelsior Geyser of Midway Geyser Basin in the foreground
Twin Buttes in Lower Geyser Basin, with Excelsior Geyser of Midway Geyser Basin in the foreground
Twin Buttes in Lower Geyser Basin, with Excelsior Geyser of Midway Geyser Basin in the foreground

Photograph of Twin Buttes in Lower Geyser Basin looking to the northwest, with Excelsior Geyser of Midway Geyser Basin in the foreground. Twin Buttes is a thermal kame that formed when glaciers covered the area, and hydrothermal activity below the ice led to melting and the deposition and cementation of glacial sediments.

Photograph of Twin Buttes in Lower Geyser Basin looking to the northwest, with Excelsior Geyser of Midway Geyser Basin in the foreground. Twin Buttes is a thermal kame that formed when glaciers covered the area, and hydrothermal activity below the ice led to melting and the deposition and cementation of glacial sediments.

The Yellowstone borehole geophysical network
The Yellowstone borehole geophysical network
The Yellowstone borehole geophysical network
The Yellowstone borehole geophysical network

The Yellowstone borehole geophysical network, installed by UNAVCO in 2007–2008. The placement of the boreholes is focused primarily around the caldera, and the boreholes contain a mix of instruments, including strainmeters, seismometers, tiltmeters, and pore pressure sensors.

The Yellowstone borehole geophysical network, installed by UNAVCO in 2007–2008. The placement of the boreholes is focused primarily around the caldera, and the boreholes contain a mix of instruments, including strainmeters, seismometers, tiltmeters, and pore pressure sensors.

Imperial Geyser, Lower Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park
Imperial Geyser, Lower Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park
Imperial Geyser, Lower Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park
Imperial Geyser, Lower Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park

Imperial Geyser, Lower Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park. USGS photo by Lauren Harrison, July 2021.

Landsat 8 visible and thermal infrared images of Yellowstone from July 17, 2021
Landsat 8 visible and thermal infrared images of Yellowstone
Landsat 8 visible and thermal infrared images of Yellowstone
Landsat 8 visible and thermal infrared images of Yellowstone

Visible and thermal infrared images of Yellowstone acquired on July 17, 2021.  In the visible image, Landsat 8 channels 4-3-2 are assigned red-green-blue colors (respectively) to simulate natural color.  In thermal infrared image, bright pixels are warmer, and dark pixels are cooler.  The full satellite images are clipped to the boundaries of Yellowst

Visible and thermal infrared images of Yellowstone acquired on July 17, 2021.  In the visible image, Landsat 8 channels 4-3-2 are assigned red-green-blue colors (respectively) to simulate natural color.  In thermal infrared image, bright pixels are warmer, and dark pixels are cooler.  The full satellite images are clipped to the boundaries of Yellowst

Seismogram from station YTP in Yellowstone National Park on July 15-16, 2021
Seismogram from station YTP in Yellowstone on July 15-16, 2021
Seismogram from station YTP in Yellowstone on July 15-16, 2021
Seismogram from station YTP in Yellowstone on July 15-16, 2021

Seismogram from station YTP in Yellowstone National Park showing earthquakes from the swarm beneath Yellowstone Lake that began late on July 15, 2021. Each row represents 30 minutes of seismic data.

Seismogram from station YTP in Yellowstone National Park showing earthquakes from the swarm beneath Yellowstone Lake that began late on July 15, 2021. Each row represents 30 minutes of seismic data.

USGS scientists carrying field equipment to set up a gas monitoring station in Yellowstone National Park
USGS scientists carrying field equipment to set up a gas monitoring station in Yellowstone National Park
USGS scientists carrying field equipment to set up a gas monitoring station in Yellowstone National Park
USGS scientists carrying field equipment to set up a gas monitoring station in Yellowstone National Park

USGS scientists Laura Dobeck and Sara Peek carrying field equipment to set up a gas monitoring station in Yellowstone National Park. USGS photo by Jennifer Lewicki, July 13, 2021.

USGS scientists Laura Dobeck and Sara Peek carrying field equipment to set up a gas monitoring station in Yellowstone National Park. USGS photo by Jennifer Lewicki, July 13, 2021.

Geologic block-diagram and conceptual model of Mammoth Hot Springs area
Geologic block-diagram and conceptual model of Mammoth Hot Springs
Geologic block-diagram and conceptual model of Mammoth Hot Springs
Geologic block-diagram and conceptual model of Mammoth Hot Springs

Geologic block-diagram and conceptual model of possible flow systems associated with thermal areas at Mammoth Hot Spring (MHS) area from Sorey (1991) (USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 91-4052).  Also shown are the Bear Creek Hot Springs (BC) and La Duke Hot Spring (LD).

Geologic block-diagram and conceptual model of possible flow systems associated with thermal areas at Mammoth Hot Spring (MHS) area from Sorey (1991) (USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 91-4052).  Also shown are the Bear Creek Hot Springs (BC) and La Duke Hot Spring (LD).

Hebgen Lake recent seismicity and 1959 deformation
Hebgen Lake recent seismicity and 1959 deformation
Hebgen Lake recent seismicity and 1959 deformation
Hebgen Lake recent seismicity and 1959 deformation

Epicenters of 6,188 earthquakes in the Hebgen Lake region since 1990 determined by the University of Utah Seismograph Stations and the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology. All epicenters have horizontal uncertainties of 1.0 km or less.

Epicenters of 6,188 earthquakes in the Hebgen Lake region since 1990 determined by the University of Utah Seismograph Stations and the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology. All epicenters have horizontal uncertainties of 1.0 km or less.

Comparison of Porkchop Geyser in September 1984 (left) and August 1986 (right)
Comparison of Porkchop Geyser in Sep 1984 (left) and Aug 1986 (right)
Comparison of Porkchop Geyser in Sep 1984 (left) and Aug 1986 (right)
Comparison of Porkchop Geyser in Sep 1984 (left) and Aug 1986 (right)

Comparison of Porkchop Geyser in September 1984 (left) and August 1986 (right).  The Geyser entered a period of near-constant eruption in 1985, and the pool disappeared; it exploded on September 5, 1989.

Comparison of Porkchop Geyser in September 1984 (left) and August 1986 (right).  The Geyser entered a period of near-constant eruption in 1985, and the pool disappeared; it exploded on September 5, 1989.